Doctrine of Intention in the Law of Courts - 1204 Words

DOCTRINE OF INTENTION IN THE LAW OF COURTS A contract is an agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted, and each party benefits. When we look to see if a valid contract has been formed we look at the formation of the contract i.e. offer, acceptance, consideration and Intention to create legal relationships. This is an integral part of contract law. In England and most civil law countries existence of a contract depends on a theory that parties intend to be legally bound. The rule dates back to 1919’s where the court dismissed that a husband can be enforced to pay a fixed amount of sum he promised his wife. The doctrine of intention focuses primarily on whether both parties intend to be legally†¦show more content†¦Presumption can be seen in action in the case of (Esso Petroleum Ltd V Commissioners Of Custom amp; Excise) where substantial and concrete evidence is required to rebut presumption in commercial agreements. Presumption can be contradicted by an express term which clearly shows that parties do not intend to have legal relations e.g. â€Å"Subject to contract† and honour clauses as seen in the case of Rose and Franck Co V H R Crompton and Bros It can be said that intention to create legal relations was used as a tool by courts so that they can differentiate between the commercial agreements that courts supported had some sort of bargain , something for something and the social and domestic agreements did not. Due to courts discretion in such agreements intention can be a difficult doctrine to anticipate. Over the passing years society has changed a lot in attitude and that has led courts to change their approach towards this firmShow MoreRelatedThe Doctrine Of Privity, Developed By The Common Law, Worked Before The 1999 Act955 Words   |  4 PagesThe doctrine of privity, developed by the common law, worked before the 1999 Act. Cases such as Tweddle v Atkinson, Dunlop v Selfridge , Beswick v Beswick clearly elucidate the above statement. However, the doctrine of privity wasn’t without its flaws for even though it provided certainty, it led to socially unjustifiable results. The 1999 Act was passed to mitigate the harsh results that the courts came to using the doctrine. The doctrine of privity operates to exclude claims from third partiesRead MoreThe Rules Of Law Must Be Prepared1632 Words   |  7 PagesThe rules of law must be prepared to justify themselves against criticism and therefore it seems appropriate to consider the rules which under the common law prescripts what are the essential requirement by which it is determined whether an agreement can be legally obliged. It appears whether an approach can be adopted by the Court is when there is a seriousness intention to enter into such obligations which is enforceable at law. Of course, if there is no incapacity or impossibility in circumstancesRead MoreCommercial Law Case Study Essay922 Words   |  4 PagesAccording to the Australian Constitution, the power to make laws vested in the parliament , whilst the power to interpret laws and to judge whether they apply in individual cases, vested in the High Court and other federal courts. In fact, one of the major function of the high court is to interpret the Constitution. For instance, the High Court of Australia may rule a law to be unconstitutional, that is beyond the power of parliament to make, and therefore of no effect. Such a circumstance wouldRead MoreThe Origin of the Doctrine775 Words   |  4 Pagespromise.†1 Whilst the doctrine of consideration does, in some cases, cause parties to experience injustice, sometimes something that the courts fail to resolve, consideration is a crucial element to the formation of a legally binding contract. This paper will not only explain why the High Court should not abolish the requirement for consideration but will also highlight its usefulness in contract formation. Origin of the Doctrine of Consideration The origin of the doctrine of consideration can traceRead MoreStatutory Interpretation And The Doctrine Of Judicial Precedent929 Words   |  4 Pages†¢ There is, in fact, no such thing as judge-made law, for the judges do not make the law, though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable’. Lord Esher MR in Willis v Baddeley [1892] 2 QB 324 (CA) 326 With reference to the rules of Statutory Interpretation and the doctrine of judicial precedent, discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. CONSIDER STATUTORYRead MoreResponsible Corporate Officer Doctrine For The Health Care Organization907 Words   |  4 Pagesrequirement as long the corporate compliance is in place for the duration. Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine- Question 3: 10 minutes 3.) What important aspects do you find in the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine to be beneficial for the health care organization? Any changes to the (HCO) to be implemented with the use of the Doctrine? The critical aspects in the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine that are beneficial for the health care organization are in many ways. There are provisions thatRead MoreDoctrine of Covering Th Filed1521 Words   |  7 PagesThe doctrine of covering the field is a doctrine in constitutional theory that applies in federal constitutions where legislative powers are shared between the federal government and the federating states in Enumerated Lists. It applies only to legislative acts (statutes) made by the federal and state legislatures under the Concurrent Legislative List. In the US, the expression, covering the same ground, was used in Houston v Moore 18 US 1 (1820). The doctrine simply means that where there is aRead MoreThe Doctrine Of Direct Effect And State Liability1671 Words   |  7 Pages The Issue relates to the application of the doctrine of direct effect, and possibly the application of indirect effect and state liability if require in pursuant of invoking the EU Transfer of Pensions Directive (TPD) in a UK national court (NC) in light of the UK’s national legislation which evidently fails to completely encompass the directive. Directives are a secondary source of European Union (EU) legislation which in accordance with Art 288 of the EC: are binding on the EU Member StatesRead MoreRouchefoucald v Boustead Essays1506 Words   |  7 Pagesof Frauds does not prevent the proof of a fraud; and that it is a fraud on the part of the person to whom the land is conveyed as a trustee, and who knows it was so conveyed, to deny the trust and claim the land himself’. Section 53(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925 provides that ‘a declaration of trust respecting any land or any interest therein must be manifested and proved by some writing signed by some person who is able to declare such trust or by his will’. S53(1)(b) indicates that inRead MoreEssay The Immense Power of Judges in the United Kingdom802 Words   |  4 PagesThe statement made above is true to a certain extent. The legal system in the United Kingdom is mainly based on The Doctrine of the Separation of Powers, which is written in the 18th century by a French philosopher called Montesquieu. Montesquieu, believed that in order to have a ‘fair’ legal system, the functions should be divided into 3 different bodies of power in a state. This was to prevent absolute power in either one person or a body of people. He believed that by giving one person or a body